Annotated bibliography research in football

Football, Ncaa, Athletic Training, Sport Injury

Research from Annotated Bibliography:

Sports Mindset and the self-pride of high college football players.

Sports psychology: Annotated bibliography

Cox, 3rd there’s r. H., Yoo, H. S. (1995). Playing position and psychological skill in American football.

Log of Sport Behavior, 18(3), 183

The Journal of Sports Actions are a peer-reviewed journal centered upon exploration in sporting activities psychology as well as its articles aren’t directed toward a popular viewers. According to Cox Yoo (1995) in this early analyze of the sports psychology and football, not only do different players of different sports activities share unique psychological features: even in the sport of football, a players’ situation and his or her character dimensions can be quite one of a kind. The creators begin with a literature overview of previous studies which applied the Myers-Briggs Type Products on hand (MBTI) and yielded the finding that “successful linemen had been more organized, predictable, and practical than successful backfield players. Powerful defensive back were reported to be extremely more introverted than other types of successful players, whereas successful defensive linemen were absolutely more extroverted” (Cox Yoo 1995).

The authors interviewed 43 members of a large Division 1 Midwest collegiate American football group and evaluated them making use of the Psychological Ills Inventory for Sports (PSIS R-5). They as well found marked differences between players’ mindset particularly among linesmen and backfield players. “The remark that backfield players show superior internal skills in comparison to linesmen may partially become explained by all their mental planning for competition. An job error at risk of scrimmage may result in no gain for the offense or some gain to get the rival offense, but it really doesn’t necessarily suggest a large loss or gain as does a mistake in the backfield” (Cox Yoo 1995). Backfield players showed notably significantly less anxiety and greater existence of head than other players. This article is strongly related my study topic as it underlines the effects of self-esteem within a player’s capability to excel at a certain position.

Long, D., Perry, C., Unruh, S. A., Lewis, N., Stanek-Krogstrand, K. (2011). Personal food devices of men collegiate soccer players: A grounded theory investigation. Record of Athletic Training, 46(6), 688-95

This peer-reviewed article from a kinesiology diary aimed an academic audience addresses foodstuff issues and body problems as described in guy Division II college football players. This kind of qualitative study used a grounded theory approach to determine what motivates players to eat healthfully or unhealthfully. Food decision influences included “the physical and interpersonal environments, quality, quantity, identified healthfulness, and convenience” (Long 2011). Info collection included qualitative interviews with 15 NCAA Division II soccer players. Various positions had been surveyed. Players were able to discover healthy foods that supported all their performance including “lean meats, fruits, and vegetables as preferred choices” versus junk food (Long 2011). The most common cause cited for avoiding fast food was to increase athletic overall performance. Athletes were also cost-conscious and reported picking specific types of brands over other folks based upon value, at times in the expense of nutrition. Sportsmen also complained that it was labor intensive to eat properly.

Overall, this kind of study demonstrates that athletes a new relatively positive view with their bodies and wished to fuel them correctly. There was not any sense of negative skin image in regards to diet, as