Cultural Globalization Essay

Without a doubt, the world gets smaller by minute. Certainly not literally though, but figuratively. It seems smaller sized because the folks are able to interact with each other, neglecting the limitations of your time and length.

In the associated with science and technology, folks are able to bridge the distance of our physical differences and unite everyone through relationships of interconnections of the modern day. Man is definitely not anymore limited by the physical world this individual lives in. No person is only anymore, as people receive closer to others with the advancements in travelling, telecommunications, and much more.

This cutting-edge has led to other concepts and ideas, and one of this is certainly cultural the positive effect: ideas, thinking, and principles exchanged in permeable nationwide borders leads to the interaction and interconnection of people from different ethnicities and different areas. In order to be familiar with concept of ethnic globalization even more, we need to check out its components separately. Tradition and the positive effect are different issues with different connotations. Culture is described as a set of shared attributes such as attitudes, values, practices, and goals of a specific group or perhaps organization. All of us understand that every single nation of the world possesses unique culture that sets them apart by others.

Within these nations, there are ethnicities, subcultures, and other cultures that thrive, collectively giving that particular nation a unique identity (Dyczewski, 2003). The positive effect on the other hand, is said to be the developing integration of numerous economies and societies across the world into one global economy or society. It had been Marshall McLuhan who had the first thought regarding this concept, previously phoning it a worldwide village, wherein nations can connect and interact with the other person, and is seen as the fast exchange of ideas across the world. Globalization combines the procedures which were recently limited to some specific region or land.

Having separately defined culture and globalization, we force them together into one concept, which is cultural the positive effect. It is understood to be the quick traversing of numerous ideas, ideas, values, attitudes and belief across several nations. This results to a sharing of ideas among these countries, and the consequence of this is the interconnection and discussion of each and every land. It is said the tools used for the expansion of the idea of cultural the positive effect are the mass media and interaction technologies.

It had been through this kind of that it was likely to know what’s happening consist of sides on the planet, thus promoting awareness not simply of their own country but more. Several authors have different completes in about the topic. One author, Leon Dyczewski, provides the argument that globalization can bring about the destruction and devastation of cultural and nationwide cultures, hence the relationship involving the two is far more of a damaging rather than positive.

Basing with this, we can say that the creators means to inform us that while our own cultures become more and more permeable as a result of globalization, that slowly disintegrates in order to allow for the growing idea of ethnic globalization. Another point being brought up is that there exists an introduction of a uniform and pluralistic world. Different components of the world that turns into open to the positive effect would then conform to a globalized normal of everything. This limits the people’s creativity and uniqueness, in order to achieve a globalized country.

One the other hand, the positive effect introduces the individuals to a wider universe, other that what they got used to growing up. Ethnical globalization, in the eyes from the author, is not really about the destruction of small scale nations around the world, ethnic groupings, or even the neighborhood communities. Instead, cultural the positive effect offers some type of unanimity to the people, properly leading these to a global culture that would be sure to let them maintain ethnic identity, and develop it from time to time.

However, there are those who offer an alternate perspective with the issue. Writers Breidenbach and Zukrigl describe that ethnic globalization causes cultural homogenization. Cultural globalization results to a creation of the culture that would encompass their entire aspect, creating the main culture to be adhered to. Cultural globalization simply narrows throughout the differences between everyone, probably creating a far more productive environment (Breidenbach & Zukrigl, 1998).

One criticism being slammed to social globalization is the fact it leans towards western ideology and also other practices. It had been more like changing to the best influence, which in the case of cultural globalization, is the Usa. What appeared to be an related link of individuals all over the world started to be an alternative reason to be like western countries. It is also referred to as as a McDonaldization effort by some, whom clearly opposes the concept and idea. Aspects of the west, just like McDonalds becomes a great icon of cultural the positive effect, References: Breidenbach, J., & Zukrigl, We. (1998).

The Dynamics of Cultural The positive effect. The misguided beliefs of ethnical globalization. Retrieved March 18, 2009, via http://www. inst. at/studies/collab/breidenb. htm Dyczewski, T. (2003).

The National and Ethnic Ethnicities in a Globalizing World. Gathered March 16, 2009, coming from http://www. crvp. org/conf/Istanbul/abstracts/dyczewski. htm