Achievement Motivation Theory Analysis Essay

Every single manager contains a theory on how to motivate staff to perform work. One of the most well-known motivational strategies is the Carrot and Stick method, the combination of returns and punishments to bring about a desired behavior.

Although this method of motivation can still be seen in one form or the additional in many companies today, managers are learning new strategies of motivating staff. This paper will assess two diverse job positions the author features held, and how the theory of feat motivation might and would not be applicable to those job positions. The writer will also evaluate the need to develop and make new theoretical models of motivation in today’s changing work environment.

Theory of feat Motivation Atkinson’s Achievement Determination Theory suggests that some individuals include a greater need for achievement and success than any other individuals. Those that have a high need to obtain and be effective will take on more difficult duties than those individuals who are not extremely motivated to achieve success. The following two workplace scenarios will show how a theory of achievement can affect staff. Workplace Scenario One 1 workplace situation that works well with the achievement motivation theory is the Wal-Mart organization.

Staff of Wal-Mart are paid out by the hour; yet , individuals are in a position to increase his / her salary through yearly raises and quarterly bonuses as being a direct response to his or her job functionality and development level. The foundation of this shell out system depends on the motivation of its employees. Employees’ increase is based on a scale of one through 5. Employees which have consistently excessive production levels and provide excellent customer service will receive the maximum annually raise. The quarterly bonus Wal-Mart presents its employees is determined by performance markers such as sales, customer satisfaction levels, products on hand levels, and employee presence.

This type of function setting displays achievement motivation theory evidently. Without the willingness to succeed average employees is not going to achieve the same monetary outcomes as the harder doing work employees. Wal-Mart rewards staff for top quality productivity, work ethics, and attendance. The combination of these kinds of factors is exactly what motivates the employees in reaching the desired consequence for the corporation.

Workplace Situation Two An additional workplace situation which shows where the success theory can not work will is in the union; specifically the supermarkets that make us the Usa Food and Commercial Workers (UFCW). UFCW is a national union composed of more than 1 . three or more million persons working generally in food and retail stores, and in the foodstuff processing and meat packaging industries (UFCW, 2012). Individuals that belong to this union have negotiated income and rewards. The combination of contracted salary and benefits, and the union’s backing removes a large amount of accomplishment motivation.

The union staff in a supermarket usually operate independently; although, in Wal-Mart the lifestyle is more of any team. Through the negotiated agreements between Dierbergs and the union, employees know the dimensions of the amount of pay or perhaps the amount he / she will receive for an annual increase, regardless of encounter or function productivity levels. Union workers also understand the amount of pay or perhaps raise is not going to change, for that reason there is very little motivation to improve productivity, or work at higher level of00 than a coworker.

In the food market setting personnel are paid out the same amount if they check out an average of 20 customers one hour or a couple of customers one hour. The Need for New Theoretical Models of Motivation Decades ago functioning conditions all of us not as great for most staff in the employees. Unions, including the UFCW, were formed to insure staff received fair wages and their workplace was safe.

Since that time laws have already been passed and organizations behave toward their particular employees significantly better. Many nonunion organizations praise their personnel for outstanding productivity and work integrity. The union worker’s motivation is reduced, because there is no incentive to increase productivity or practice very good work integrity outside of the actual contract describes. The staff of today is usually increasingly various with differing needs and demands of the workforce of decades back. Technology is promoting the way organizations do business and where that business is conducted.

Global companies and e-commerce companies with remarkably knowledgeable employees are now common. Another impact on in the workforce today is organizational tasks and goals are increasingly prepared around clubs. Managing these kinds of diverse, knowledgeable employees could be challenging and have a deep influence how organizations make an effort to motivate workers. The need to be familiar with influences of obvious and hidden purposes and identified abilities upon motivation is needed. (Steers, 2004) Also, an understanding of how participation in groups have a powerful impact on motivation above and beyond what can be understood by centering exclusively in individual-level effects (The Street Ahead).

Inability to meet the need for new motivational models will mean influencing just how organizations appeal to, retain, and motivate personnel. Without motivating this new type of workforce agencies may shed their profitability and will not stay competitive. Conclusion Persons are motivated to work for various reasons; yet , most work for financial stability. The challenge to get managers is actually continual discovers ways to stimulate employees to obtain organizational goals in a changing workforce.

Today’s workforce provides new problems such as technology, globalization, and team work, which did not exist before. What all types of achievement scenarios have in common would be that the person features encountered a standard of superiority and has been energized by it, largely as they or your woman knows that the forthcoming functionality will produce an psychologically meaningful analysis of personal competence (Reeve, 2009, p. 176).