A look at different views on patriotism

Freedom of Speech

In Diefenbaker’s quotation he conveys the different values that make him proud to become Canadian citizen, he is especially attached to the different freedoms that come from getting part of a free of charge country. He has the liberty of conversation to say no matter what he would like without effect and the independence of religion to worship the person who he would like to. He has the ability to protest no matter what he feels is wrong and to operate against it and most of he must freedom to select who shall govern his country through democracy. The only connection between nation which love to get his liberties is at the beginning of the quote because he definitely feels attached and prideful from the freedoms this individual enjoys like a canadian citizen rather than to his region. In the last sentence in your essay of the quotation this is demonstrated when he says that he shall defend these freedoms and try to guard it for every single person, even including those that will be part of one more nation. Therefore his non-national loyalty on the various freedoms he enjoys are better than the commitment that he has to his nation, he’d fight even his very own country in the event they tried to take this feature of Canada that this individual loves dearly. Diefenbaker is trying to get the way that in reality the only reason people may love the region they are in is because of some attribute of it, in this case his love pertaining to the protections he likes as a canadian citizen outway the actual take pleasure in he features for his country. These same liberties aren’t given to residents in other countries and he would guard them to enable them to have the same liberties he offers, his connection to the thought of freedom and liberty can be strong enough that he would guard people just about everywhere to have the same freedoms this individual has regardless if Canada was your country that was restricting his liberties.

In source 2 it reveals an image of prisoners within a labour camp in cool and unsafe conditions, they may be huddled into groups in an attempt to stay warm while that they continue looking. These inhuman conditions exist in compelled labour camps which are used in nations exactly where an authoritative government offers taken regulation of the region, that authorities punishes those that do not have precisely the same beliefs and ideas the government as well as leaders have got. With a great authoritative authorities comes ultranationalism, this way persons feel a loyalty with their nation more powerful than the like they would have got for a other citizen. Through this the us government has a better control over its citizens as they feel disobeying and not hearing would only hurt the region and in the conclusion themselves. The individuals in the time camps are those that tend not to agree with the views of the government which in the governments and other residents views get them to someone that is usually not a part of their nation, the idea that land should be most of all is a thing that many persons disagree with and when an authoritative authorities takes control they are reprimanded for it. These political criminals felt placed on something else that was transformed with a new authorities in control, then they protest because their commitment to that a thing was stronger than their loyalty with their nation. Ultranationalism punishes people that feel this kind of attachment because the speedy restriction of freedoms and changes in values within the country cause those that do not need it changed to become punished, the photographer is intending to get the point across that a solid sense of nation which will places the country above all else could result in human rights violations and in inhumane punishments for people. Ultranationalism is definitely something that potential clients those that have strong non-nationalist loyalties to be penalized as they can protest because of it and then be thrown in compelled labour camps just like in the photo.

The third origin is a picture of ESTE soldiers supporting people that have had a natural unfortunate occurances occur, in this case it was water damage. The small shacks and complexes make it look like they be are in a poor region of a country plus they looked to be ruined or on the verge to be by the flooding. The ALGUN is a global body that deals with issues across the world since often small poor countries can not handle these issues on their own as they don’t have the resources to recuperate from things like natural problems. The caption says the international community has the responsibility to help safeguard people even when they are in another nation. Obtaining the UN engaged shows just how when different nations across the globe can still help a country if they are not able to help themselves, they may use their very own resources to help protect the people of a different nation for the reason that idea that as a nation they are a part of a major international community. As part of this community countries have responsibility to assist protect people because whether or not they are part of a different country they are continue to a human being, this can be an example of wherever nationalism can be kept nevertheless extended to add people from other countries so that everybody is seen as being part of an organization. This way of thinking is usually how foreign organizations will be possible because they aren’t element of one country, with nationalism loyalty towards the country is everything so situations such as this surging would frequently result in more people being killed because other countries would not take part in. Groups including the UN may not exist as countries might try and continue to keep resources within the country since that is what is best for themselves, when that belief of nation is usually expanded to incorporate any one that may be human that results in lives such as the persons in the photo being kept.

All these sources connect and look on the idea of nationalism from different points of perspective, one by where an attribute of the nation is somewhat more important that that actual region, one in which ultra nationalism leads to those people that have certainly not nationalistic loyalties to be seriously punished, plus the last supply that shows how when ever values like the lives of individuals across the world are seen as the most important thing it leads to the creation of organizations like the UN that help everyone in the international community. The first and second source are connected in the idea that persons often have not nationalistic loyalties and values that they place over their particular value of helping all their nation. Supply one has Diefenbaker speaking about just how he loves an attribute of Canada more that he actually values his country, his love intended for the various liberties he looks forward to as a canadian citizen is definitely stronger than his like for his country. Origin two shows what generally happens to these people when those values and loyalties will be challenged when a strong respected government take control, those people happen to be sent to things such as forced work camps to work in inhumane conditions for having loyalties stronger than their very own loyalty with their country. Diefenbaker is among those people that will be put in these camps if Canada recently had an ultra nationalistic government when he would even guard this same protections he looks forward to to be provided to other people across the world, he would demonstration if the liberties he loves are considered and put in to similar prisons just like these in origin 2 . The 2nd and third source are connected mainly because they both take the idea of nationalism and possess how launched changed it may lead to vastly different things. The third source reveals how if the idea of nationalism is extended to people that aren’t as part of your country it may lead to great outcomes such as the creation in the UN and the various help it gives in people such as these being affected by natural disasters. The other source will take nationalism for the extreme whilst only concentrating on those people within the country, rather than even consider helping the ones that are outside the country rather they would penalize those in their nation since they have loyalties that are different from those inside the government. Source 3 displays how the idea of nationalism the moment extended to encompass individuals around the world can assist many people and supply 2 shows how when the idea of nationalism is too strong it leads to people that are actually part of their very own country being punished.