Game theory Essay

Identify the value (ownership) split between Chesney’s team and VCG Who have should become president of the ITC possessing company in Canada? I think pertaining to his backdrop in financial and his vast experience and deeply involved in the major capital industry of the world. Also, his specialty and investment analysis and strategy, anyone to consider in this position will probably be Dr . Computer chip president and CEO of Venture Capital Group.

Who ought to become director of TelSys International in america? Mr. Chesney is the most well suited for this position, due to his background management and telecommunication with a clearly understanding in technology. Also, because he is the currently president and founder of Telsys Who should be Leader of the Plank of ITC?

Due to Mister Chesney is the president of Telsys, I believe that the Leader of the Plank should be delegated to the vice president of Procedure Mr Montgomery, which is the high rating official of Telsys. Yet , this would turn into and significant issue in Discussion. Even though VCG is looking for fluidity and not to control the Telsys Company, as a result of Islamic traditions issue they may be not allowed to lend cash to Telsys, so the only way to do business is buying shares your company. Yet , the big concern here is that VCG want to have 50% of shares of the company, that make difficult to make a major decision in respect of the business.

3. Ethnic differences between American and Malaysian discussing styles has to be understood and anticipated if negotiation is to be successful. Exactly what are the significant distinctions, as you discover them? A number of the different I use noticed is that VCG is based in financial persons and Telsys is based in Engineering employees. The fact that American traditions is base on individualism, and Malasya culture in collectivism. One of the most importance difference in regards of the case is the religion matter been VCG (Islamic) plus the Telsys (Euro/Christian) 4. Will be the two edges better off discussing as opponents or because collaborators?

Clarify. Taking in concern the risk I believe that collaborators the way to go settling this subject because the two would pursue to achieve the same goal with regard of the firm. 5. In Chesney’s role, what info would you need that is currently lacking in the case material? Maybe more information inside the size of the organization